|
A comparison with humans and a critique of methods of study. For
thousands of years, men and women have strived to explain the why of their
existence. To discover the reasons for how we act the way we do and what this
knowledge can do to impact the way we live our lives in this complex society
that we have created. One of the ways that science has begun to shed light on
the inner workings of the human condition is through Primatology. Built from the
words Primate which refers to a group of animals closely related to humans and
logos which is a Greek word meaning ‘the study of’ Primatology’s goals
include more than simply to amass data on the primate species. Rather a
Primatologist observes data about primates in an effort to understand the
primate species under their study and to relate that data back to the human
condition so that we can learn more about ourselves through our evolutionary
cousins. In recent years, Primatologists have done much research on all aspects
of the life of the western lowland Gorilla, known scientifically as: gorilla
gorilla gorilla (Fay, 1989). In this paper I will compare these primates, more
precisely classified as great apes, to humans in an attempt to illuminate both
differences and similarities between the two species. More specifically, I will
focus on the social structure of the western lowland Gorilla, describing how
these predominantly gentle creatures live in a society similar to that of humans
in many ways. Finally, in my conclusion I will explore the methods that
Primatologists use to study primates such as the western lowland Gorilla and
whether those methods are biased towards or against the Gorillas. However, I
cannot draw indelible conclusions about these subjects as I have had no time
studying these animals in the field and have only the observations and writings
of others from which to draw my data and form opinions. The most common of the
Gorilla species, there are approximately ten thousand to thirty five thousand
western lowland Gorillas in the wild and five hundred and fifty individuals in
captivity worldwide. They are found in Nigeria, Cameroon, Gabon, Congo, Central
African Republic and Zaire in increasingly shrinking habitats due to the
incessant encroachment of human populations. Western lowland gorillas are
covered with black or brown-gray fur with black skin on chests, palms, and
faces. Red heads are common in Camaroon gorillas especially. Males develop a
silver back as they mature this is not unlike the tendency for many human males
to develop gray hair as they mature as well. The main difference being that only
Gorilla males develop silver backs whereas in humans both males and females
alike tend to lose their hair coloring with age. Unlike humans, which are
bipedal, walking on two legs, Gorillas are quadrupedal, they walk on all fours
with the soles of their feet flat on the ground with the knuckles of the hands
curled and planted on the ground (Schaller, 1963). Although they are mainly
quadrupedal, gorillas can travel bipedally but generally no farther than
approximately six meters (Schaller, 1963). This upright stance is used most
often used for chest beating, to observe something of interest, or to reach an
object (Schaller, 1963). Gorillas recognize each other by their faces and body
shapes. Each gorilla has a unique nose print which researchers can use to
identify animals in the field (Schaller, 1963). This is very much like humans
who recognize each other almost exclusively by visual identification of the
facial features. Gorillas sleep about 13 hours each night and rest for several
hours at midday. They build new sleeping nests every night by bending nearby
plants into a springy platform, usually on the ground or in low trees. When not
resting, they spend most of their time looking for food and eating it. Despite
their fearsome size (three hundred to five hundred pounds for males and one
hundred fifty to two hundred fifty pounds for females) and large canine teeth
the western lowland gorilla is an herbivore. They consume over two hundred types
of leaves, tubers, flowers, and fruit, supplemented with fungus and some types
of insects. Gorillas do not drink water. They obtain all the moisture they need
from the vast amounts of foliage they consume. Males consume approximately fifty
pounds of vegetation a day (Elizabeth, 1990). This is very different from the
omnivorous diet of the human species, which has often been observed stalking and
killing a Big Mac. All joking aside though, a human’s daily diet contains
considerably more protein than a Gorilla might consume in a week or more
(Elizabeth, 1990). A Gorilla has an enormous head, with a bulging forehead
overhanging the eyes and a bony crest on top. The sagittal crest, which is
especially noticeable in adult males, supports large muscles used to process the
large amounts of vegetative matter in their diet. The Human skull sports no such
sagittal crest and the jaw muscles are greatly smaller than those found in the
Gorilla no doubt illustrating Human adaptation away from a diet consisting
largely of coarse vegetable matter. This is also evident in the differences
between Human and Gorilla dentition (teeth). Human teeth are very slight when
compared to the massive molars that can be found in the jaws of the Gorillas,
another important adaptation for processing plant material. Having outlined
several of the major differences and similarities between humans and the western
lowland Gorilla, I would like to turn to examining the complex social structure
of these creatures. A typical group of Gorillas is made up of six or seven
animals, usually one dominant male known as the ‘silverback’, several adult
females, and offspring of various ages, from infants to maturing black backs
(young males). The silverback offers protection to the females and offspring
from predators and other strange male gorillas (Tutin and Fernandez, 1991). This
is somewhat analogous to the role of the Human male in many family and extended
family units across many Human cultures, which is largely a role of protection
from enemies of the group. Although in many instances, the role of the Human
male is extended to that of providing for the group as well as protecting it.
Sexually mature female Gorillas leave their family group to join lone males or
other small mixed groups. This leads to the females in a band being unrelated
and serves to encourage genetic dispersal among the groups avoiding excessive
inbreeding. A maturing male leaves his family group (sometimes driven off by the
dominant silverback) to establish his own group, to roam alone, or to join a
bachelor group. These wandering males follow other bands in order to entice
females to join them in the hope of founding a successful group and spreading
their genes through many offspring. The last two sentences might well refer to
Human males and with little alteration. Human males practice exactly the same
kind of migrations in many human cultures where they eventually leave the group
in which they grew up to seek their fortune and often a mate as well. Although
it is possible the need to secure one’s fortune is driven by the need to be
successful to woo a mate but that is of course a bit of speculation on my part.
When Primatologists study their subjects in the field and in zoos and parks, are
they being unbiased in their appraisal of the animals they have taken upon
themselves to study? I believe that as a human being it is impossible to
separate oneself completely from the unique Human point of view. This leads to
the interpretation that yes in fact Primatologists do make biased observations
of the behaviors of these creatures. That they are appraising the Gorillas as
Humans must, with human terms and human values on certain things that allow a
species to have ‘language’ or ‘think’ or have a ‘culture.’ I do not
believe that this is entirely a bad thing as it is important and natural for us
to relate to objects, ideas, and indeed other species in terms that make sense
to us. However the question remains, does the western lowland Gorilla have
culture? The science of Anthropology defines culture as every thing we say,
think, and do in our daily lives. The true limits on the use of the term culture
then become how we define thinking, speaking, and doing things. If we must
imagine beings in our own image then we are doomed to have no companions on this
Earth and certainly none beyond it. However, if we broaden our minds and allow
for the possibility of thinking, speaking, and doing things in a manner that is
unlike our own, we may find there are more creatures with more rich and diverse
cultures than we had ever imagined. Dixson, A. F. The Natural History of the Gorilla. New York: Columbia University Press, 1981. Fay, Michael, et al. "Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) in the Likoula Swamp Forests of North Central Congo: Preliminary Data on Populations and Ecology." Journal of Primatology, Vol 10, No. 5, 1989, pp. 477-486. Fossey, Dian. Gorillas in the Mist. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1983. Macdonald, David, (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mammals: 1. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1985. Rogers, M. Elizabeth, et al. "Gorilla diet in the Lope Reserve, Gabon: a nutritional analysis." Oecologia, 1990, pp. 326-339. Schaller, George. The Mountain Gorilla. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963. Williamson, Elizabeth A. et al. "Composition of the Diet of Lowland Gorillas at Lope in Gabon." American Journal of Primatology, 21. 1990, pp. 265-277. |
|
|
Home: Free Essays, Book Reports and Essay Writing
|
Top 100 Essay Sites -
Top 50 Essay Sites -
Top 25 Essay Sites
|